Publications

Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network

Quantifying and suppressing ranking bias in a large citation network

Citation counts for papers from different fields can't be compared directly because they adopt different citation practices. Researchers have proposed various procedures to suppress these biases, but a new statistical framework shows that existing indicators, including the relative citation count, are still biased by paper field and age. A new normalization procedure motivated by the z-score produces much less biased rankings when applied to citation count and PageRank score. The problem of achieving an ideal unbiased ranking of publications remains open.

Read More
Data-driven modeling of collaboration networks: A cross-domain analysis

Data-driven modeling of collaboration networks: A cross-domain analysis

The analysis shows that collaboration networks from two different domains, economics and science, share common structural features. A data-driven modeling approach was used to calibrate agent-based models for each domain, which were then validated by reproducing network features not used for calibration. The results indicate that newcomers in R&D collaborations prefer links with established agents, while newcomers in co-authorship relations prefer links with other newcomers. This sheds new light on the role of endogenous and exogenous factors in network formation.

Read More