The Role Of Network Embeddedness On The Selection Of Collaboration Partners: An Agent-Based Model With Empirical Validation

Scientists study the role of network embeddedness in collaboration partner selection using an agent-based model. The model reproduces empirical coreness differences of collaboration partners and explains why high network embeddedness leads to a change in partner selection. The study focuses on two types of collaborations: R&D alliances between firms and co-authorship relations between scientists. The model's results suggest that agents with high network embeddedness are more likely to select partners that are already well-connected within the network. This has implications for the design of collaboration systems and the understanding of how agents form collaborations.

Collaboration networks show a pronounced core –periphery structure, where a small, but highly integrated core of agents coexists with a large and sparse periphery.
Why This Matters for Scientists

As a scientist, you may want to consider how the network position of agents affects the selection of collaboration partners when designing your own collaboration system. The study's findings suggest that agents with high network embeddedness are more likely to select partners that are already well-connected within the network.

Quick Technical Overview

The study uses an agent-based model to analyze two types of collaborations: R&D alliances between firms and co-authorship relations between scientists. The model's novelty lies in its ability to reproduce empirical coreness differences of collaboration partners and explain why high network embeddedness leads to a change in partner selection.

The details of our agent-based model and its calibration for the two di®erent systems are explained in Sec. 2.
  
Summary for Policy Makers

The study's findings have implications for the design of collaboration systems and the understanding of how agents form collaborations. Agents with high network embeddedness are more likely to select partners that are already well-connected within the network, which can lead to the formation of more effective collaborations. This has important implications for policymakers and stakeholders who seek to promote collaboration and innovation.

Collaboration networks show a pronounced core –periphery structure, where a small, but highly integrated core of agents coexists with a large and sparse periphery.
  
Disclaimer

The above summaries were generated with the assistance of an AI system.

Abstract

We use a data-driven agent-based model to study the core–periphery structure of two collaboration networks, R&D alliances between firms and co-authorship relations between scientists. To characterize the network embeddedness of agents, we introduce a coreness value obtained from a weighted k-core decomposition. We study the change of these coreness values when collaborations with newcomers or established agents are formed. Our agent-based model is able to reproduce the empirical coreness differences of collaboration partners and to explain why we observe a change in partner selection for agents with high network embeddedness.

Related Posts

Should the government reward cooperation? Insights from an agent-based model of wealth redistribution

Should the government reward cooperation? Insights from an agent-based model of wealth redistribution

A multi-agent model was used to investigate how government bonuses impact cooperation. The model showed that bonuses can promote cooperation, especially in a global information regime. In this regime, the critical bonus needed to encourage cooperation decreases as the level of cooperation increases. This allows the government to lower tax rates while maintaining high cooperation levels.

Read More
Reproducing scientists' mobility: a data-driven model

Reproducing scientists' mobility: a data-driven model

Scientists often move around the world to share ideas and work together, but how do these moves actually happen? This study looked at millions of career paths to map out how researchers travel between cities, countries and institutions. It found that most scientists prefer to move shorter distances, usually less than 1000 kilometers, and tend to choose places that are both close and well-regarded. The research also showed that the way we visualize these moves changes depending on the scale. At the city level, scientists move more freely, while at the country or institution level, clear pathways called “knowledge corridors” emerge. This helps us understand how knowledge spreads and how scientific careers develop over time, with important implications for both scientists and policymakers.

Read More